Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon R7 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R7 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R7 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is build with Vega architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 614% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 170% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 147% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 850% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 346% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 685% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 281% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 1350% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 123% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 650% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1060% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Vega | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Vega Mobile | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 November 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 690 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.16 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |