Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon R9 370
When choosing between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R9 370, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R9 370.
Radeon R9 370
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 46% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 370.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is build with Vega architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 3200 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 240−250 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 43% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Vega | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Vega Mobile | Trinidad |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 15 November 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.16 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon HD 7870
- Radeon R9 370 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
- Radeon R9 370 vs Radeon HD 7870
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon HD 7950
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
- Radeon R9 370 vs Radeon HD 7950
- Radeon R9 370 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI