Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is build with Vega architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 34% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 27% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Vega | Fermi |
| Code name | Vega Mobile | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.16 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |