Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro Vega 16 stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is build with Vega architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 732 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 383% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 327% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 240−250 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 60−65 | − |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 98% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 433% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 190% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 316% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 480% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 90% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 271% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 344% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Vega | Fermi |
Code name | Vega Mobile | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 15 November 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.16 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |