Quadro GP100 vs Radeon Pro Vega II
When comparing Quadro GP100 and Radeon Pro Vega II, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro GP100 and Radeon Pro Vega II is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro GP100
Radeon Pro Vega II
Main Specs
| Quadro GP100 | Radeon Pro Vega II | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 235 Watt | 475 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 4x USB Type-C |
- Radeon Pro Vega II has 102% more power consumption, than Quadro GP100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro Vega II has 16 GB more memory, than Quadro GP100.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro GP100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega II - with GCN 5.1.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega II is 270 MHz higher, than Quadro GP100.
- Quadro GP100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega II - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega II is 182 MHz higher, than Quadro GP100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega II in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Quadro GP100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| low / 720p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega II in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Quadro GP100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro GP100 and Radeon Pro Vega II have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
| QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| 4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| high / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| Quadro GP100 and Radeon Pro Vega II have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| Quadro GP100 and Radeon Pro Vega II have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| Quadro GP100 and Radeon Pro Vega II have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega II in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Quadro GP100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 240−250 | 260−270 |
| medium / 1080p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega II in Fortnite is 11% more, than Quadro GP100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| low / 720p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega II in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Quadro GP100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| high / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega II in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro GP100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega II in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Quadro GP100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Quadro GP100 and Radeon Pro Vega II have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega II in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than Quadro GP100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega II in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Quadro GP100. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 260−270 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega II in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Quadro GP100. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega II in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro GP100. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro GP100 | Radeon Pro Vega II | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.1 |
| Code name | GP100 | Vega 20 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2016 | 3 June 2019 |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 1304 MHz | 1574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 1720 MHz |
| Transistor count | 15,300 million | 13,230 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 323.0 | 440.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 10,329 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1430 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 732.2 GB/s | 825.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.0 | |