FirePro M4000 vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When comparing FirePro M4000 and Radeon Pro W5500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4000 and Radeon Pro W5500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro W5500M
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 157% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 7500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 87% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4000 and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 34% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 54% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 17% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than FirePro M4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | GCN | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Navi 14 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 512 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |