FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When comparing FireStream 9250 and Radeon Pro W5500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon Pro W5500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9250
Radeon Pro W5500M
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- FireStream 9250 has 76% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 10014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 65% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 147% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | RV770 | Navi 14 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |