GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon Pro W5500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon Pro W5500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro W5500M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 70% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon Pro W5500M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 127.6 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs FirePro W8100
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GT 1030
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon RX 540
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GT 1030
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon RX 540