GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon Pro W5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 260 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro W5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 260 Check Price

Radeon Pro W5500M

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 260	Radeon Pro W5500M
Power consumption (TDP)	182 Watt	85 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	4 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	No outputs
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 260 has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 892 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 11001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	3−4	14−16
ultra / 1080p	1−2	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	14−16	30−33
medium / 1080p	5−6	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	7−8	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	20−22	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	200−210
medium / 768p	95−100	170−180
ultra / 1080p	45−50	95−100
QHD / 1440p	24−27	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	70−75	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	90−95
ultra / 1080p	27−30	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	4−5	16−18
ultra / 1080p	3−4	14−16
4K / 2160p	1−2	6−7
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	5−6	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	18−20
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	95−100
medium / 1080p	16−18	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	9−10	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	45−50	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	9−10	27−30
ultra / 1080p	3−4	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	2−3	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	8−9	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	65−70	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	6−7	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	7−8	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	18−20	50−55
medium / 768p	12−14	30−35
high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	30−35
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 260.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 260	Radeon Pro W5500M
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Code name	GT200	Navi 14
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 June 2008	10 February 2020
Pipelines	192	1408
Core clock speed	1242 MHz
Boost Clock		1450 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	7 nm
Texture fill rate	36.9 billion/sec	127.6
Floating-point performance	476.9 gflops
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width	448 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	999 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	111.9 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+
CUDA cores	192
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	30 Mh/s
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares