GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon Pro W5500M

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro W5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 285M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro W5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 285M SLI Check Price

Radeon Pro W5500M

GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:

GeForce GTX 285M SLI Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 285M SLI	Radeon Pro W5500M
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	85 Watt
Interface		PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors		No outputs
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 76% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 10980 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	8−9
QHD / 1440p	3−4	3−4
low / 720p	27−30	30−33
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	20−22
QHD / 1440p	5−6	6−7
4K / 2160p	4−5	5−6
low / 720p	45−50	50−55
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	200−210
medium / 768p	170−180	170−180
ultra / 1080p	90−95	95−100
QHD / 1440p	50−55	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	130−140	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 0% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
medium / 768p	90−95	90−95
ultra / 1080p	60−65	60−65
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	90−95	95−100
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
QHD / 1440p	8−9	8−9
low / 720p	45−50	50−55
medium / 1080p	24−27	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p	80−85	80−85
medium / 768p	70−75	70−75
high / 1080p	27−30	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−12	12−14
QHD / 1440p	2−3	2−3
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p	9−10	9−10
ultra / 1080p	7−8	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
medium / 768p	30−35	30−35
high / 1080p	16−18	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−11
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p	100−105	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 285M SLI	Radeon Pro W5500M
Architecture	G9x	RDNA 1.0
Code name	N10E-GTX	Navi 14
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	2 March 2009	10 February 2020
Pipelines	256	1408
Core clock speed	576 MHz
Boost Clock		1450 MHz
Transistor count	1508 Million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	7 nm
Texture fill rate		127.6
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1020 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth		192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	DirectX 10, Shader 4.0	12 (12_1)
Shader Model		6.5
OpenGL		4.6
OpenCL		2.0
Vulkan		1.2.131
CUDA	+
Laptop size	large
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon Pro W5500M

GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares