GeForce GTX 870M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When comparing GeForce GTX 870M and Radeon Pro W5500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 870M and Radeon Pro W5500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro W5500M
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 870M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 870M has 17% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
- GeForce GTX 870M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 870M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
- GeForce GTX 870M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 870M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- GeForce GTX 870M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Fortnite is 14% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
GeForce GTX 870M and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 870M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | N15P-GT | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 108.3 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |