GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When comparing GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon Pro W5500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon Pro W5500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro W5500M
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon Pro W5500M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 9500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 42% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 28% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 34% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |