GeForce MX450 vs Radeon Pro W5500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX450 and Radeon Pro W5500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX450 stacks up against Radeon Pro W5500M, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro W5500M
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5,GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 70% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 1998 MHz higher, than GeForce MX450.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| GeForce MX450 and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Navi 14 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 August 2020 | 10 February 2020 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1408 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 6,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 127.6 |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |