GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon Pro W5500M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon Pro W5500M.

GRID K520

Radeon Pro W5500M

Main Specs

	GRID K520	Radeon Pro W5500M
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	85 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K520 has 164% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
GRID K520 and Radeon Pro W5500M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 7000 MHz higher, than GRID K520.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	4−5	3−4
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	30−35	30−33
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	20−22
QHD / 1440p	9−10	6−7
4K / 2160p	6−7	5−6
low / 720p	55−60	50−55
medium / 1080p	27−30	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K520 and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	200−210
medium / 768p	180−190	170−180
ultra / 1080p	100−110	95−100
QHD / 1440p	55−60	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−35	30−33
high / 768p	140−150	130−140
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	110−120	100−110
medium / 768p	95−100	90−95
ultra / 1080p	65−70	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	27−30	24−27
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	100−110	95−100
medium / 1080p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 9% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	27−30	24−27
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	10−11	8−9
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	55−60	50−55
medium / 1080p	30−35	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	90−95	80−85
medium / 768p	80−85	70−75
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
QHD / 1440p	4−5	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	10−11	9−10
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
4K / 2160p	3−4	2−3
low / 720p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
GRID K520 and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	16−18
low / 720p	60−65	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	60−65	50−55
medium / 768p	35−40	30−35
high / 1080p	20−22	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	30−35
high / 768p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	Radeon Pro W5500M
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 1.0
Code name	GK104	Navi 14
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013	10 February 2020
Pipelines	1536	1408
Core clock speed	745 MHz
Boost Clock		1450 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	127.6
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s

GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares