HD Graphics 530 vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When comparing HD Graphics 530 and Radeon Pro W5500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between HD Graphics 530 and Radeon Pro W5500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro W5500M
HD Graphics 530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 530 here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 530 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 466% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 530.
- HD Graphics 530 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- HD Graphics 530 has 60 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
- HD Graphics 530 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 530 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 75% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 162% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 28% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than HD Graphics 530. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics 530 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 August 2015 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 24 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |