Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon Pro W5500M
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 540 and Radeon Pro W5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 540 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro W5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 466% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 60 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
- Iris Graphics 540 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 540 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 63% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Graphics 540 and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 32% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 45% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 14% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 540. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 127.6 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |