Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon Pro W5500M
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon Pro W5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro W5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 466% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 54% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GT 1030
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon RX 540
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GT 1030
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon RX 540