Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon Pro W5500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon Pro W5500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 stacks up against Radeon Pro W5500M, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 88% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 24% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 52% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 40 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 1030
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 540
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GT 1030
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon RX 540