Quadro 3000M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 3000M and Radeon Pro W5500M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 3000M and Radeon Pro W5500M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 13% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 11375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 75% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Navi 14 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 10 February 2020 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1408 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 6,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 127.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |