Quadro K1100M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When comparing Quadro K1100M and Radeon Pro W5500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K1100M and Radeon Pro W5500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1100M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 88% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro K1100M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro K1100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Quadro K1100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Quadro K1100M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 9200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 212% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 275% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro K1100M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K1100M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GK107 | Navi 14 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 705 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.59 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |