Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro W5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro W5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro W5500M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 30% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 6988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 28% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 34% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Navi 14 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |