Quadro K3000M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When choosing between Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro W5500M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro W5500M.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K3000M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 13% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro W5500M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 9200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 87% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 54% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 17% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K3000M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | N14E-Q1 | Navi 14 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 10 February 2020 |
| Pipelines | 576 | 1408 |
| Core clock speed | 654 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 6,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.39 | 127.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |