Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Radeon Pro W5500M
In this comparison between Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro W5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T2000 Max Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro W5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro W5500M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 Max Q | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 112% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro W5500M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 4000 MHz higher, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 Max Q | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 MAX-Q | Navi 14 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 930 / 1200 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1500 / 1620 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 | 127.6 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Radeon Pro 570
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon Pro 570
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs GeForce GT 1030
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Radeon RX 540
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GT 1030
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon RX 540