Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon R7 M270
In this comparison between Radeon Pro W5500M and Radeon R7 M270 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro W5500M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro W5500M | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x8, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- Radeon Pro W5500M is build with RDNA 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 446% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 237% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 340% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro W5500M | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Navi 14 | Opal XT / Mars |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 10 February 2020 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1408 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,400 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |