FirePro S9000 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 2100, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S9000
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 900% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 240% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Tahiti | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |