FireStream 9250 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Radeon PRO WX 2100.
FireStream 9250
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 19% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 120% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 42% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 54% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 3% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
| Code name | RV770 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |