GeForce 825M vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing GeForce 825M and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 825M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 825M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 825M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce 825M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
2−3
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 850% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
30−33
110−120
ultra / 1080p
6−7
55−60
QHD / 1440p
−
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
18−20
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
85−90
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 108% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
low / 768p
18−20
55−60
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
80−85
95−100
high / 1080p
60−65
90−95
ultra / 1080p
50−55
80−85
medium / 1080p
75−80
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
10−11
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 180% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
0−1
27−30
medium / 768p
−
18−20
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
high / 768p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 825M.
Full Specs
GeForce 825M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK208
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
27 January 2014
21 March 2018
Pipelines
384
512
Core clock speed
850 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.11
39.01
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price