GeForce 930A vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When choosing between GeForce 930A and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 930A and Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce 930A
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 930A | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce 930A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 930A and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 930A is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 930A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce 930A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 3998 MHz higher, than GeForce 930A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 30% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 54% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 930A | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
| Code name | GM108 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.58 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |