GeForce GT 545 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 545 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 545 stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 2100, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GT 545
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 545 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GT 545 has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GeForce GT 545 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GT 545 has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GeForce GT 545 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GT 545 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GT 545 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4400 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 545.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 50% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 545 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GF116 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 14 May 2011 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 144 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.28 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |