GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 160M has 71% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
27−30
110−120
ultra / 1080p
7−8
55−60
QHD / 1440p
−
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
10−11
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 158% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
low / 768p
18−20
55−60
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
high / 1080p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
0−1
27−30
medium / 768p
−
18−20
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
high / 768p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
N10E-GS1
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
21 March 2018
Pipelines
64
512
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
39.01
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
large
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price