GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon PRO WX 2100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon PRO WX 2100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 2000 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 363% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 266% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 392% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 196% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 485% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 378% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | Turing | Polaris |
Code name | TU117 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | no data | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |