GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 5050 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
7−8
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
140−150
medium / 768p
150−160
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
55−60
QHD / 1440p
45−50
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
120−130
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
80−85
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−12
low / 720p
85−90
65−70
medium / 1080p
40−45
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
6−7
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
medium / 768p
65−70
50−55
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
8−9
5−6
ultra / 1080p
6−7
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−11
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
95−100
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
40−45
27−30
medium / 768p
27−30
18−20
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−33
21−24
high / 768p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
N10E-GTX
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
21 March 2018
Pipelines
256
512
Core clock speed
585 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
39.01
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
950 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price
