GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
160 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin & 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
768 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 460 has 357% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 460 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 460 has 766 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 460 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 460 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 2400 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
7−8
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−12
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 460 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
140−150
medium / 768p
150−160
110−120
ultra / 1080p
75−80
55−60
QHD / 1440p
45−50
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
110−120
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
medium / 768p
80−85
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Dota 2 is 24% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
12−14
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−33
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
low / 720p
80−85
65−70
medium / 1080p
40−45
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Fortnite is 33% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
20−22
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
5−6
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
7−8
5−6
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−11
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Metro Exodus is 57% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
95−100
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
40−45
27−30
medium / 768p
24−27
18−20
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
high / 768p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Fermi
Polaris
Code name
GF104
Polaris 12
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
12 July 2010
21 March 2018
Pipelines
336
512
Core clock speed
675 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
37.80
39.01
Floating-point performance
907.2 gflops
1,248 gflops
Length
8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
3600 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
16x PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
