GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon PRO WX 2100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon PRO WX 2100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 13% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
| Code name | GF104 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |