GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 560 Ti will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 560 Ti has 385% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 3996 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
7−8
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−12
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
27−30
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
140−150
medium / 768p
180−190
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
55−60
QHD / 1440p
50−55
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−35
27−30
high / 768p
140−150
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
medium / 768p
95−100
60−65
ultra / 1080p
65−70
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
18−20
9−10
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
20−22
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
20−22
10−12
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
100−110
65−70
medium / 1080p
55−60
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Fortnite is 73% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
27−30
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
9−10
2−3
4K / 2160p
9−10
−
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
30−33
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
85−90
55−60
medium / 768p
75−80
50−55
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
10−11
5−6
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 72% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
27−30
medium / 768p
35−40
18−20
high / 1080p
20−22
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−12
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Fermi
Polaris
Code name
GF114
Polaris 12
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
25 January 2011
21 March 2018
Pipelines
384
512
Core clock speed
822 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
52.67
39.01
Floating-point performance
1,263.4 gflops
1,248 gflops
Length
229 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2004 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
128.3 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
2.1
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
87 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.39 Gh/s
Check Price
Check Price
