GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When choosing between GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 950A
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950A has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GeForce GTX 950A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 3998 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon R9 M470
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro K2000D
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon HD 8870M
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Quadro K2000D
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon HD 8870M