GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon PRO WX 2100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 965M stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 2100, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 965M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 3500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
7−8
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
27−30
10−12
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
230−240
140−150
medium / 768p
200−210
110−120
ultra / 1080p
110−120
55−60
QHD / 1440p
85−90
30−35
4K / 2160p
45−50
27−30
high / 768p
160−170
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
medium / 768p
100−110
60−65
ultra / 1080p
75−80
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
24−27
9−10
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
27−30
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 145% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−12
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
65−70
medium / 1080p
70−75
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 110% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
12−14
2−3
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−110
55−60
medium / 768p
90−95
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 185% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
120−130
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
20−22
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
70−75
27−30
medium / 768p
45−50
18−20
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Maxwell
Polaris
Code name
N16E-GS, N16E-GR
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 January 2015
21 March 2018
Pipelines
1024
512
Core clock speed
944 MHz
Boost Clock
950 / 1151 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
2,940 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
73.60
39.01
Floating-point performance
2,355 gflops
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2500 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
G-SYNC support
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
1024
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
226 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
GameStream
+
GeForce ShadowPlay
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
BatteryBoost
+
Check Price
Check Price