GRID K140Q vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When choosing between GRID K140Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K140Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GRID K140Q
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 271% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 58% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 109% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 850% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |