GRID K220Q vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing GRID K220Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K220Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 70% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 31% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 280% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |