GRID K240Q vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 23% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 35% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |