HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When choosing between HD Graphics 630 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between HD Graphics 630 and Radeon PRO WX 2100.
HD Graphics 630
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 133% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 62 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- HD Graphics 630 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 30% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 70% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Polaris |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |