Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 28% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
140−150
medium / 768p
130−140
110−120
ultra / 1080p
65−70
55−60
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
100−110
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
10−12
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−35
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 13% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
95−100
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
30−35
27−30
medium / 768p
21−24
18−20
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Polaris
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
21 March 2018
Pipelines
40
512
Core clock speed
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
39.01
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
