Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon PRO WX 2100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Xe MAX Graphics stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 2100, check out specs charts below.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
LPDDR4x
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 1734 MHz higher, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
7−8
ultra / 1080p
21−24
4−5
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
18−20
medium / 1080p
40−45
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
55−60
12−14
ultra / 1080p
45−50
10−12
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
60−65
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
250−260
140−150
medium / 768p
220−230
110−120
ultra / 1080p
180−190
55−60
QHD / 1440p
110−120
30−35
4K / 2160p
70−75
27−30
high / 768p
210−220
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
medium / 768p
110−120
60−65
ultra / 1080p
100−110
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
45−50
9−10
ultra / 1080p
40−45
8−9
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
4−5
low / 720p
80−85
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
60−65
16−18
ultra / 1080p
45−50
10−12
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
65−70
medium / 1080p
110−120
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 240% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
45−50
12−14
QHD / 1440p
30−35
2−3
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
65−70
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
140−150
55−60
medium / 768p
120−130
50−55
high / 1080p
70−75
14−16
ultra / 1080p
30−35
7−8
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
20−22
3−4
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
65−70
14−16
medium / 1080p
30−35
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
130−140
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
120−130
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
14−16
medium / 1080p
35−40
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
130−140
27−30
medium / 768p
85−90
18−20
high / 1080p
45−50
10−11
ultra / 1080p
24−27
7−8
4K / 2160p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
high / 768p
60−65
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Gen. 12 Xe
Polaris
Code name
iDG1LPDEV
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
31 October 2020
21 March 2018
Pipelines
96
512
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
39.01
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4266 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 12.1
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
