NVS 510 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

When choosing between NVS 510 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 510 and Radeon PRO WX 2100.

NVS 510 Check Price

Radeon PRO WX 2100 Check Price

Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:

Radeon PRO WX 2100 Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 35 Watt.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
NVS 510 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p	60−65	140−150
medium / 768p	27−30	110−120
ultra / 1080p	7−8	55−60
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	16−18	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 158% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 204% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	14−16
low / 768p	18−20	55−60
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 79% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	27−30
medium / 768p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture	Kepler	Polaris
Code name	GK107	Polaris 12
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	21 March 2018
Pipelines	192	512
Core clock speed	797 MHz
Boost Clock		1219 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	39.01
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	1,248 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	48 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares