P106 100 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between P106 100 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
P106 100 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 242% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- P106 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- P106 100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- P106 100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- P106 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- P106 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 2008 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 240% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. |
Full Specs
P106 100 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Polaris |
Code name | GP106 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 19 June 2017 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |