Quadro 2000D vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 77% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 2000D and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 57% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
| Code name | GF106 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |