Quadro CX vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro CX and Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Quadro CX
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 70% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 31% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs Quadro K2000D
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 8870M
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Quadro K2000D
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon HD 8870M