Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 57% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |