Quadro K1000M vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing Quadro K1000M and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K1000M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K1000M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K1000M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1000M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K1000M has 28% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro K1000M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
27−30
110−120
ultra / 1080p
7−8
55−60
QHD / 1440p
−
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
10−11
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 158% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
low / 768p
18−20
55−60
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
high / 1080p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
0−1
27−30
medium / 768p
−
18−20
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
high / 768p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K1000M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14P-Q1
Polaris 12
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
21 March 2018
Pipelines
192
512
Core clock speed
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
13.60
39.01
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price