Quadro K2200 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing Quadro K2200 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2200 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2200 has 94% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Quadro K2200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro K2200 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Quadro K2200 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro K2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
Quadro K2200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
18−20
7−8
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
21−24
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
27−30
12−14
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−12
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
27−30
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
220−230
140−150
medium / 768p
190−200
110−120
ultra / 1080p
110−120
55−60
QHD / 1440p
75−80
30−35
4K / 2160p
40−45
27−30
high / 768p
160−170
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 76% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
medium / 768p
100−110
60−65
ultra / 1080p
75−80
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
21−24
9−10
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
45−50
21−24
medium / 1080p
24−27
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
27−30
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−12
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
110−120
65−70
medium / 1080p
65−70
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 93% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−12
2−3
low / 720p
60−65
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 135% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
95−100
55−60
medium / 768p
85−90
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
10−12
5−6
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
65−70
27−30
medium / 768p
40−45
18−20
high / 1080p
21−24
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
Quadro K2200
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Maxwell
Polaris
Code name
GM107
Polaris 12
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
22 July 2014
21 March 2018
Pipelines
640
512
Core clock speed
1046 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
44.96
39.01
Floating-point performance
1,439 gflops
1,248 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
5.0
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
162 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.6 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price